Difference between revisions of "The Logarithms, Its Discovery and Development"

From Math Images
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|ImageIntro=<font color=red>This page is under development and I am doing research on it. But I will make this my biggest project to undertake for the summer and I vow to make this page perfect and complete. Xingda 18/6</font>
 
|ImageIntro=<font color=red>This page is under development and I am doing research on it. But I will make this my biggest project to undertake for the summer and I vow to make this page perfect and complete. Xingda 18/6</font>
 
|ImageDescElem=zzz
 
|ImageDescElem=zzz
|ImageDesc=Since people knew how to do <math>x^y</math> where <math>x,y \in \mathbb{R}</math>, it was natural for people to come up with an operation that tells us the power, knowing the base and the result, i.e. obtain <math>x</math> in <math>a^x=b</math>. The solution, of course, is <math>x=log_ab</math> as we know today.  
+
|ImageDesc=This section, though embedded in this page as a sub section, stands equal to an independent article and hence, I direct you to [[The Logarithms, Its Discovery and Development]]. Having found a very thin but immensely interesting volume, [http://www.archive.org/details/johnnapierinvent00hobsiala ''John Napier and the Invention of Logarithms, 1614 --- A Lecture''], by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._W._Hobson Ernest William Hobson], I was fascinated by logarithm's history and its subsequent development into what we know today. The book is a very concise and succinct volume that presented how John Napier delivered his original ideas. It is an absolute a pleasure to read because it translated Napier's arguments and thoughts into relatively modern mathematical symbols and notations and at the same time preserved and revealed Napier's ingenuity. In the redirected page, most of the ideas are from the above mentioned book and another wonderful book by Lancelot Hogben, [http://books.google.com/books?id=0ms4xyvhxbQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=mathematics+for+the+million&source=bl&ots=kBvshhk9k6&sig=RQ1bJOSi1ByS_Ep-gpK6kSkG2_0&hl=en&ei=m5UbTMPeNML88AakvNijCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false Mathematics for the Million: How to Master the Magic of Numbers]. In addition, I have supplied some additional proofs and necessary information for understanding. Though a thorough understanding of the books requires some careful thoughts and deliberate ruminations, in the end, you will find that you will appreciate logarithms a lot more than you did before. However, you should not be intimidated and discouraged by the section, in which case you should continue to the next section.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Since people knew how to do <math>x^y</math> where <math>x,y \in \mathbb{R}</math>, it was natural for people to come up with an operation that tells us the power, knowing the base and the result, i.e. obtain <math>x</math> in <math>a^x=b</math>. The solution, of course, is <math>x=log_ab</math> as we know today.  
  
  

Revision as of 09:16, 22 June 2010

Inprogress.png
Two Pages from John Napier's Logarithmic Table
Napier logtable.jpg
Field: Algebra
Image Created By: John Napier
Website: Milestones in the history of thematic cartography, statistical graphics, and data visualization

Two Pages from John Napier's Logarithmic Table

This page is under development and I am doing research on it. But I will make this my biggest project to undertake for the summer and I vow to make this page perfect and complete. Xingda 18/6


Basic Description

zzz

A More Mathematical Explanation

Note: understanding of this explanation requires: *A little Algebra

This section, though embedded in this page as a sub section, stands equal to an independent article a [...]

This section, though embedded in this page as a sub section, stands equal to an independent article and hence, I direct you to The Logarithms, Its Discovery and Development. Having found a very thin but immensely interesting volume, John Napier and the Invention of Logarithms, 1614 --- A Lecture, by Ernest William Hobson, I was fascinated by logarithm's history and its subsequent development into what we know today. The book is a very concise and succinct volume that presented how John Napier delivered his original ideas. It is an absolute a pleasure to read because it translated Napier's arguments and thoughts into relatively modern mathematical symbols and notations and at the same time preserved and revealed Napier's ingenuity. In the redirected page, most of the ideas are from the above mentioned book and another wonderful book by Lancelot Hogben, Mathematics for the Million: How to Master the Magic of Numbers. In addition, I have supplied some additional proofs and necessary information for understanding. Though a thorough understanding of the books requires some careful thoughts and deliberate ruminations, in the end, you will find that you will appreciate logarithms a lot more than you did before. However, you should not be intimidated and discouraged by the section, in which case you should continue to the next section.


Since people knew how to do x^y where x,y \in \mathbb{R}, it was natural for people to come up with an operation that tells us the power, knowing the base and the result, i.e. obtain x in a^x=b. The solution, of course, is x=log_ab as we know today.


Today, we regard taking logarithms as nothing but the inverse of calculating exponential. i.e. x=log_ab knowing a^x=b. It seems that taking logarithms is as natural as operations involving indices. Then it should come at a huge surprise that at the time of Napier, the notion of index, in its generality, was no part of the stock of ideas of a mathematician, and that the exponential notation was not yet in use. In addition to that, Napier predated Isaac Newton and Leibniz so calculus and subsequently calculation by means of infinite series was not available him as well. It was with these difficulties that Napier invented and calculated the logarithms.


Napier published the Mirifici Logarithmorum Canonis Descriptio (The Description of the Wonderful Canon of Logarithms) in 1614 which did not contain an account of the methods by which the "wonderful canon" was constructed. It was not until after his death, Mirifici Logarithmorum Canonis Constructio (The Construction of the Wonderful Canon of Logarithms) was published in 1619. It was later found out that the "Constructio" was written before the "Descriptio".

It should be noted that Napier did not try to obtain the logarithms of natural numbers. Instead, he was trying to obtain the logarithms of sines of angles. Note that Sine was not defined as the ratio as we know it today. It was defined as the length of that semi-chord of a circle of given radius which subtends the angle at the center. Hence we have the relation crd \theta = 2sin \frac {\theta}{2}. Napier took the radius to be 10^7 units. Therefore, Napier was actually looking for the logarithms of the numbers between 0 and 10^7, not for equidistant numbers, but for the numbers corresponding to equidistant angles. It also should be observed that the logarithms in Napier's table are not what we know under the name of natural logarithms. Therefore, to




Teaching Materials

There are currently no teaching materials for this page. Add teaching materials.









If you are able, please consider adding to or editing this page!


Have questions about the image or the explanations on this page?
Leave a message on the discussion page by clicking the 'discussion' tab at the top of this image page.