Difference between revisions of "Pythagorean Tree"
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
The total area of a Pythagorean Tree is actually quite simple to find. Simply put, it is the area of the original square (Iteration "O") multiplied by the number of iterations plus one. Or ''A=s<sup>2</sup>*n+1'', where ''s'' of course is the length of one of the sides, and n is the number of iterations. | The total area of a Pythagorean Tree is actually quite simple to find. Simply put, it is the area of the original square (Iteration "O") multiplied by the number of iterations plus one. Or ''A=s<sup>2</sup>*n+1'', where ''s'' of course is the length of one of the sides, and n is the number of iterations. | ||
− | [[Image: | + | [[Image:PTree01.jpeg]] |
As you can see, for 0 iterations, A.K.A the original square, the area is ''s<sup>2</sup>''. Or, when using the formula, ''s<sup>2</sup>*0+1=s<sup>2</sup>'' | As you can see, for 0 iterations, A.K.A the original square, the area is ''s<sup>2</sup>''. Or, when using the formula, ''s<sup>2</sup>*0+1=s<sup>2</sup>'' | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
Now, on the first iteration, a trend that will become apparent for the every iteration onward appears. | Now, on the first iteration, a trend that will become apparent for the every iteration onward appears. | ||
− | [[Image: | + | [[Image:PTree02.jpeg]] |
NOTE:The triangles in a Pythagorean tree are NOT actually there, in the sense that there is no "interior". The sides are all there, but where the interior would be, there is nothing. As such, the triangles are not counted when looking at the area of a Pythagorean Tree. | NOTE:The triangles in a Pythagorean tree are NOT actually there, in the sense that there is no "interior". The sides are all there, but where the interior would be, there is nothing. As such, the triangles are not counted when looking at the area of a Pythagorean Tree. | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
A 45-45-90 tree will be used to explain the way the perimeter works, because such a tree shows the most basic way it changes. In a 45-45-90 tree, each and every square in an iteration is congruent. Not so much true for other types of trees, and therefore a bit more difficult to find the perimeter. Referring back to.. | A 45-45-90 tree will be used to explain the way the perimeter works, because such a tree shows the most basic way it changes. In a 45-45-90 tree, each and every square in an iteration is congruent. Not so much true for other types of trees, and therefore a bit more difficult to find the perimeter. Referring back to.. | ||
− | [[Image: | + | [[Image:PTree02.jpeg]] |
Revision as of 07:39, 26 July 2013
Pythagorean Tree, in 2 Dimensions |
---|
Pythagorean Tree, in 2 Dimensions
- A Pythagorean Tree is a fractal that is created out of squares. Starting from an initial square, two additional smaller squares are added to one side of the first square such that the space between all three squares is a right triangle. The side of the larger square becomes the hypotenuse of that right triangle.
Contents
Basic Description
The Pythagorean Tree begins with a square that has a right triangle branching off of it. The hypotenuse of the triangle must always be directly connected to the square. When the right triangle is created, the legs of that triangle then become one of the sides of two brand new squares. The lengths of the legs are not changed during this process, so the area of the each new square is less than the area of the original square. The sum of the areas of the two smaller squares is equal to the area of the big square (shown in the More Mathematical Explanation). The interesting thing about the tree is that the other non-right angles of the right triangle can be any value. Side lengths correspond to angles, so change the angle will change the side length too. This relationship between side length and angle is what causes the tilt for most Pythagorean tress.
A More Mathematical Explanation
- Note: understanding of this explanation requires: *Basic Algebra and Geometry, Trigonometry
In this image, CDF is a right triangle. The original square ABCD has a side length of s and an area of s^{2}. We will derive the relationship between the area of the smaller squares and the area of the larger square. We can rewrite the area of CFHG and DFIJ in terms of s and θ_{1}:
- Square CFHG:
- Square DFIJ:
We now have the relationship between the larger square and each of the smaller squares. However, note what happens when we add the areas of the smaller squares.
We have just proved that the sum of the areas of the smaller squares always adds up to the area of the larger square. Another way of thinking about this property is the Pythagorean theorem. Right triangle CDF has side lengths a, b, and s, with s as the hypotenuse. The Pythagorean theorem states that
- .
Since a^{2}, b^{2}, and s^{2} are the areas of each square, the Pythagorean also shows this interesting property of Pythagorean Trees.
The Area of the Tree for any number of iterations
The total area of a Pythagorean Tree is actually quite simple to find. Simply put, it is the area of the original square (Iteration "O") multiplied by the number of iterations plus one. Or A=s^{2}*n+1, where s of course is the length of one of the sides, and n is the number of iterations.
As you can see, for 0 iterations, A.K.A the original square, the area is s^{2}. Or, when using the formula, s^{2}*0+1=s^{2}
Now, on the first iteration, a trend that will become apparent for the every iteration onward appears.
NOTE:The triangles in a Pythagorean tree are NOT actually there, in the sense that there is no "interior". The sides are all there, but where the interior would be, there is nothing. As such, the triangles are not counted when looking at the area of a Pythagorean Tree.
The specific trend is that, with every coming iteration, the areas of the squares will be much lower than that of the previous, but there will be twice as many, so the total sum of the areas of the newly iterated squares will become equivalent to the area of the original square. The total sum of the areas of every square in an iteration is equal to the area of the original square. In this case, for example, there was one square of s^{2}, and the new iteration had two squares. Since the triangle used to make the tree is a 45-45-90, the two smaller squares are congruent, but even if they weren't, the end result would be the same. The sum of their areas would be equal to the area of the original square. To confirm the formula, s^{2}+(.5s^{2}+.5s^{2})=2s^{2} This being iteration 1, our formula would be A=s^{2}*1+1=s^{2}*2=2s^{2}. The formula would continue to increase at a similar rate indefinitely. It is a fractal, and can therefore go on to any value. As such, the formula can calculate it for any amount of iterations.
A 45-45-90 tree will be used to explain the way the perimeter works, because such a tree shows the most basic way it changes. In a 45-45-90 tree, each and every square in an iteration is congruent. Not so much true for other types of trees, and therefore a bit more difficult to find the perimeter. Referring back to..
This image, we can see that the area of the smaller squares is s^{2}/2. Of course, the area of a square is one of the side lengths squared, so if we take s^{2}/2, and find the square root, we get one of the side lengths, which is s/√2'. Now, if we were to iterate further...
We'd find that the area of the newly iterated squares is s^{2}/4. If you take the square root of that, you'd find that it comes out to a clean s/2. Also known as √2*√2. Iterate further, the denominator in the area becomes 8. Square root of 8? 2√2. It goes like this indefinitely. For each iteration, you just multiply the denominator of the side length by √2. The numerator is always s. Of course, this only applies to 45-45-90. Although that's only for one side, the formula remains unchanged. All that happens is that you multiply the fraction by 4, since all four sides of a square are congruent. The perimeter of the squares changes wildly when different right triangles are used.
History of the Tree.
Albert E. Bosman was the one who created the Pythagorean Tree. He did so in 1942. He was a Dutch Mathematician, who was born in 1891 and died in 1961.
Teaching Materials
- There are currently no teaching materials for this page. Add teaching materials.
Leave a message on the discussion page by clicking the 'discussion' tab at the top of this image page.