Difference between revisions of "Field:Fractals"

From Math Images
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
This concept can be explained in a commonly used analogy involving the coastline of an <balloon title="Actually the image is a picture of the border of Norway, not an island!" style="color:green"> island </balloon>:
 
This concept can be explained in a commonly used analogy involving the coastline of an <balloon title="Actually the image is a picture of the border of Norway, not an island!" style="color:green"> island </balloon>:
 +
 +
  <div style="text-decoration:italic; position:relative; left:15px">Suppose you wanted to measure the total perimeter of an island. You could begin by roughly estimating the perimeter of the island by measuring the border of the island from a high vantage point like an airplane and using miles as units. Next, to be more accurate, you could walk along the island's borders and measure around its various coves and bays using a measuring tape. Then, if you wanted to be really accurate, you could carefully measure around every single protruding rock and detail of the island with a yardstick or even a foot-long ruler.</div>
 +
 
   Suppose you wanted to measure the total perimeter of an island. You could begin by roughly estimating
 
   Suppose you wanted to measure the total perimeter of an island. You could begin by roughly estimating
 
   the perimeter of the island by measuring the border of the island from a high vantage point like an
 
   the perimeter of the island by measuring the border of the island from a high vantage point like an

Revision as of 15:07, 3 June 2009


Fractals

NorwayCoastline.png

A fractal is often defined as a geometric shape that is self-similar, that is, whose magnified parts look like a smaller copy of the whole. The term "fractal" was coined by Benoit Mandelbolt in 1975 from the latin term fractus meaning "fragmented" or "irregular".

This concept can be explained in a commonly used analogy involving the coastline of an island :

Suppose you wanted to measure the total perimeter of an island. You could begin by roughly estimating the perimeter of the island by measuring the border of the island from a high vantage point like an airplane and using miles as units. Next, to be more accurate, you could walk along the island's borders and measure around its various coves and bays using a measuring tape. Then, if you wanted to be really accurate, you could carefully measure around every single protruding rock and detail of the island with a yardstick or even a foot-long ruler.
 Suppose you wanted to measure the total perimeter of an island. You could begin by roughly estimating
 the perimeter of the island by measuring the border of the island from a high vantage point like an
 airplane and using miles as units. Next, to be more accurate, you could walk along the island's borders
 and measure around its various coves and bays using a measuring tape. Then, if you wanted to be really
 accurate, you could carefully measure around every single protruding rock and detail of the island with
 a yardstick or even a foot-long ruler.

Clearly, the perimeter of the island would grow as you decrease the size of your measuring device and increase the accuracy of your measurements. Also, the island would more or less self-similar (in terms of becoming more and more jagged and complex) as you continued to decrease your measuring device.


Contents

[[Image:|300px|thumb|right|]]