Apollonian Snowflake

From Math Images
Revision as of 11:43, 17 April 2012 by Victorc (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search
Inprogress.png
Apollonian Snowflake
Colorful circles.png
Field: Fractals
Image Created By: Me (Victor)

Apollonian Snowflake

This is a combination of the Apollonian Gasket and the Koch Snowflake, both of which are fractals. The result will be an endless fractal made from two existing fractals. Its really a half-Apollonian Gasket because I'm only iterating the largest inscribed circle for each triangle. To start, a construction of the Koch Snowflake must be made because this will be the layout for the circles. On Geometers Sketchpad (GSP, a very useful program that I highly recommend to those who read this page) I am able to make a Koch Curve tool. This tool will let me apply the Koch Curve to any line segment. (Look at the bottom for specific instructions). Simultaneous, I add inscribed circles to my Curve tool. These circles will be my Apollonian aspect of my image. When I increase the iterations of the snowflake, the circles will iterate as well. As cool as this sounds already, adding colors will really make the snowflake ten times more awesome.
 PROBLEMS THAT ARISE
-My Koch Curve Tool starts Iteration 3. There is no way to decrease  the iterations 
back to iteration 0, the start. 
-The number of circles on the Koch Snowflake is determined by the number of circles 
in my Curve tool. The more circles that I add to the tool, the more circles will appear 
when I iterate.
-The circles in my Iteration 0 triangle need to be drawn separately because they 
are not included in the Koch Curve tool.

Problem of Apollonius with image of Apollonian Gasket

Koch Snowflake


Basic Description

The goal is to have an Apollonian Gasket in a Koch Snowflake since both fractals are endless. There will be circles within triangles, which make up the Koch Curve. The Koch Curve Tool that I made in Geometers sketchpad only takes care of one part. Where are the circles? By incorporating circles into my tool, the circles and triangles will make more copies of itself as I increase the iteration. The basis of this Koch Curve Plus Circles tool is shown in Iteration 0 (picture below). The more circles and the more detail I add to my tool (size, color, etc.) the more detailed the Snowflake will be.


Iteration 0
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
Iteration 4



A More Mathematical Explanation

Note: understanding of this explanation requires: *Fractals

Oohhh! Now the mathematical part. My first step was to find the area of the actual Koch Snowflake and [...]

Oohhh! Now the mathematical part. My first step was to find the area of the actual Koch Snowflake and see how the area changes. Here are the iterations I used. I labeled different triangle types, Type 1 being the largest and Type 5 being the smallest.

0iteration.png
1iteration.png
2iteration.png
3iteration.png
4iteration.png


I created charts to show the area of the snowflake at each iteration, up to iteration 4. (In my charts, the variable A represents the side length of the triangle in Iteration 0.) I made the last chart to see how the area at each iteration changes as A increases.

This first chart shows the area in terms of A. The area is basically a long string of math that I keep extending with each iteration.
Chart 1.png
Chart 2.png
This is nice and all but I would need separate equations for each Iteration number.

Okay so now it is simple to see how the area increases with each iteration. But what I'm looking for is a function that when I sub in the Iteration number, I will be able to find the area. This calls for two variables, the iteration number and a constant. The constant is the length of the side of the triangle in Iteration 0. By looking at the charts, I see that the areas are expressed through a long string of math. The string is made up of segments and each segment corresponds to an iteration number. With each additional iteration, another segment of arithmetic is added onto the previous string. So the area at a specific iteration is dependent on the area of the previous iteration. Likewise, my function will have a similar pattern where the knowledge of the previous area will allow me to find the area of the current iteration. Confused??? Let me explain further.


Basically, I am trying to find out how the area changes with each iteration. The change is from Function1.png where subscript n is the iteration number. If you look at the chart above where I represent the areas in terms of A, there is an apparent pattern starting from Iteration 1. The pattern is represented by the expression Function4.png where N is the iteration number and A is the length of the side of the triangle in iteration 0. Function4.png is what's being added onto my string of math as I increase the iterations. So Function2.pngwhere N is the iteration number and A is the constant. However, the problem is that this function is unable to find the area at Iteration 0. THE AREA AT ITERATION 0 WILL ALWAYS BE GIVEN. This is the only way to find the area of the Koch snowflake using this function.


But this is how the area changes. What do I do if I want to find the area and all I have is the number of iterations? The function Function3.png will help. For this function, the knowledge of the area of the previous iteration will help you find the area of the current iteration. The tedious part of this is that you would need to know all the areas of the iterations before. So if you wanted to find the area of Iteration 3, you would need to find the area at Iteration 2 and you can only find the area at Iteration 2 if you know the area of Iteration 1. The more iterations, the more tedious work must be done.




Teaching Materials

There are currently no teaching materials for this page. Add teaching materials.

About the Creator of this Image

Victor has worked countless hours with this image, mastering Geometers Sketchpad along the way. The sweat and effort that he has put into this is what makes it amazing.








If you are able, please consider adding to or editing this page!


Have questions about the image or the explanations on this page?
Leave a message on the discussion page by clicking the 'discussion' tab at the top of this image page.


  [[Description::This is a combination of the Apollonian Gasket and the Koch Snowflake, both of which are fractals. The result will be an endless fractal made from two existing fractals. Its really a half-Apollonian Gasket because I'm only iterating the largest inscribed circle for each triangle. To start, a construction of the Koch Snowflake must be made because this will be the layout for the circles. On Geometers Sketchpad (GSP, a very useful program that I highly recommend to those who read this page) I am able to make a Koch Curve tool. This tool will let me apply the Koch Curve to any line segment. (Look at the bottom for specific instructions). Simultaneous, I add inscribed circles to my Curve tool. These circles will be my Apollonian aspect of my image. When I increase the iterations of the snowflake, the circles will iterate as well. As cool as this sounds already, adding colors will really make the snowflake ten times more awesome.
 PROBLEMS THAT ARISE
-My Koch Curve Tool starts Iteration 3. There is no way to decrease  the iterations 
back to iteration 0, the start. 
-The number of circles on the Koch Snowflake is determined by the number of circles 
in my Curve tool. The more circles that I add to the tool, the more circles will appear 
when I iterate.
-The circles in my Iteration 0 triangle need to be drawn separately because they 
are not included in the Koch Curve tool.

Problem of Apollonius with image of Apollonian Gasket

Koch Snowflake|]]